For home health agencies, hospice providers, and other CMS-enrolled home care entities, the Change of Ownership (CHOW) process is one of the most consequential regulatory components of a sale. CHOW timing affects close date. CHOW structure affects successor liability. CHOW execution affects post-close billing continuity.
This guide covers what home care sellers need to understand about CHOW.
CHOW is governed primarily by 42 CFR 489.18 along with the Medicare Provider Enrollment regulations (42 CFR 424). The framework defines:
The CHOW process is administered by the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) for the provider’s region.
A CHOW is triggered by:
CHOW reporting is required even when ownership change does not include the provider agreement (for tracking purposes).
In a stock sale, the entity (and therefore the Medicare provider agreement) continues. The CHOW process is:
Timeline: Typically 30–90 days for CMS processing. Faster than asset sale CHOW.
Asset sales offer the buyer a choice:
The choice depends on buyer’s risk tolerance and seller’s compliance history.
Successor liability under CHOW is one of the most consequential issues for both buyers and sellers.
What transfers with the provider agreement:
Mitigation through deal structure:
Healthcare-specialized R&W underwriting addresses much CHOW-related successor liability — but specific identified exposures typically remain seller-indemnified outside R&W.
Medicare CHOW does not automatically address Medicaid enrollment changes. State Medicaid programs typically require:
State timelines vary widely. Some states process Medicaid CHOW in 30 days; others take 90+ days. Multi-state agencies face cumulative timing complexity.
Medicare-certified home health and hospice agencies typically maintain accreditation through:
Accreditation transfer in CHOW:
Accreditation re-survey can add 60–120+ days to operational timeline.
Sellers preparing for CHOW should:
CHOW timing affects deal structure in several ways:
1. Underestimating CHOW timeline. Asset sale CHOW can delay close by 90+ days.
2. Late state Medicaid coordination. State processes are independent of federal CHOW.
3. Inadequate audit exposure documentation. Pre-close audit findings affect successor liability and indemnification negotiation.
4. Cost report timing ignored. Pending cost report settlements affect deal economics.
5. Accreditation transfer neglected. Accreditation re-survey can disrupt operations.
6. Inadequate billing transition planning. Pre-close to post-close billing transition affects cash flow.
7. Multi-state complexity underestimated. Each state operates independently.
Hendon Partners coordinates with CMS regulatory counsel to plan and execute CHOW timing in alignment with overall deal timeline. We help sellers prepare CHOW documentation, address audit exposure proactively, and structure successor liability allocation through indemnification and R&W coverage.
Schedule a confidential CHOW-aware conversation with Hendon Partners →
Hendon Partners is a sell-side only home care M&A advisory firm. We coordinate with — but do not provide — regulatory or legal counsel.
Selling a Medicare-Certified Home Health Agency: A Complete 2026 Guide
State GuidesSelling a Home Care Agency in Colorado: 2026 Market Guide
State GuidesSelling a Home Care Agency in Illinois: 2026 Market Guide
State GuidesSelling a Home Care Agency in Massachusetts: 2026 Market Guide
State GuidesSelling a Home Care Agency in Pennsylvania: 2026 Market Guide
Buyer IntelligencePrivate Equity Firms Buying Home Care in 2026: Profiles, Check Sizes, and What Each Wants
Newsletter
Receive new articles, EBITDA benchmark updates, and deal intelligence directly in your inbox. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.
Join 1,200+ home care executives. Unsubscribe anytime.